Charles Uchenna Nwadavid
Two years for laundering $2M+ of romance proceeds in crypto
Case facts
- Region
- Nigeria / United States
- Estimated loss
- $2M+ in victim losses
- Victims
- Multiple romance fraud victims
- Filed
- Sep 14, 2026
Last reviewed .
Court record
- Court / jurisdiction
- U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston)
- Case number
- 24-cr-10022-LTS
- Key dates
- Scheme period charged: approximately 2016 – September 2019
- Sentenced: October 2025 — two years
Court-convicted: Charles Uchenna Nwadavid was sentenced to two years in prison in the District of Massachusetts (case 24-cr-10022-LTS) for stealing more than $2 million from romance scam victims and laundering the proceeds through cryptocurrency.
Two years in prison, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, case 24-cr-10022-LTS. The charged scheme ran from roughly 2016 to September 2019 and moved more than $2 million taken from romance fraud victims.

This case documents the conversion layer of romance fraud — the step where money stops being traceable through banks and starts moving through wallets, exchanges and swaps.
How the laundering leg works
- Mule accounts receive victim wires under a plausible commercial description.
- Rapid conversion into cryptocurrency, usually within hours of the deposit clearing.
- Layering across multiple wallets, chains and swap services to break the transaction trail.
- Cash-out through exchanges with weak identity checks, or through peer-to-peer brokers.
What this means for victims
- Speed is everything. A wire flagged within hours can be recalled; one flagged in a week usually cannot.
- Crypto is not anonymous. Chain analysis produced the restitution order in this very case. Save every wallet address you were given.
- Never receive and forward money. That role is prosecuted, and "I was in love" is not a defence to money laundering.
Check a wallet before you pay
Search any wallet address, exchange handle or payment name in our database before sending funds — reported addresses reappear across unrelated victims more often than most people expect.
Why read this here instead of the BBC or Al Jazeera?
A broadcaster covered the sentence; it does not maintain a searchable index of laundering wallets, payment names and mule accounts. This dossier does. The identifiers from this case live in the same database you can search before paying anyone — that utility, not the news summary, is the reason this page exists.
Why does it still matter now?
Crypto conversion is now the default exit for romance fraud, not the exception. The mule-to-wallet-to-layering sequence documented here is the current standard, and the court-documented money trail in this case is why victims should preserve wallet addresses — chain analysis turns old evidence into recoverable money.
Legal disclaimer
Based on publicly reported court outcomes from U.S. Department of Justice announcements, published in the public interest. Corrections may be requested through our I'm Innocent review process.
Primary evidence
Named here and believe it's a mistake?
Every OSS file is eligible for review. Submit an "I'm Innocent" appeal with supporting evidence and a moderator will re-examine this dossier within 5 business days.
Request a review